![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:13 • Filed to: panamera, sport, turismo, porsche, depreciation | ![]() | ![]() |
What do you reckon a $95,000 Panamera Sport Turismo will depreciate to in 5 and in 10 years?
I found a ‘13 Platinum AWD in my area for $49,000 with 44k miles on it.
Widening my search I can get down to
$34k/70K/Panamera S (2010)
or
$36k/52K/Panamera 4 (2011)
Provided I stay under 100k miles, I’d really like to be at 50k or less.
Anyway, those new were around $95k, fair? They depreciated 63% on average between the two (WOW). There were many more examples available at that price point.
So if 7 years from now I want a Sport Turismo, I can expect to pay just a touch more than that + inflation, right? right? Is it a bad decision? I see a bunch of them going past 100k miles, so they are fairly reliable?
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:15 |
|
I doubt there’ll be much depreciation because I don’t think they’ll sell that many of them.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:16 |
|
I’d say tree-fiddy
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:20 |
|
5: a few dollars.
10: dollars.
30: ALL THE DOLLARS
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:26 |
|
Entirely possible/likely, I’m holding onto hope that it’ll sell well and have decent depreciation somewhat close to the sedan.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:27 |
|
What is this thing? A Wrangler? 5, same price, 10 almost the same price, 30 modified all to hell, same price + 10k.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:36 |
|
Far less than the current panamera. The last gen of the panamera is pretty unloved but people buy it because in performance and function it is good. I think the next gen panamera, and particularly the wagon; they are going to be more sought after because they look better. Not to mention, the wagons are probably going to be rare.
Even just using TSX wagons or CTS wagons as an example; they are typically listed on the high end of the range compared to their sedan counterparts.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:46 |
|
They’ll be worth 1 bitcoin.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:54 |
|
Hmm, all good points. Hadn’t considered this generation being significantly better than the previous, as previously I didn’t care about the panamera, haha.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 13:55 |
|
Well that’s a loaded answer.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 14:03 |
|
I think a good way to equate this would be 996.1 vs. 997. The two models aren’t that vastly different but the 996 had growing pains and people despised the headlights so it just hasn’t been able to level off the depreciation.
I’m not positive but I’d guess that the 997 is depreciating far less quickly than the 996 did at a comparable age.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 14:18 |
|
Early Panameras in Mexico are listed for about $40k, these are base models though and pretty rare.
My guess is in 5 years they will be work 55-60k if they had an MSRP of 95.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 14:22 |
|
Oh yeah. Much less quickly. Some think the 997 has bottomed out.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 14:24 |
|
I’ll be keeping a close eye on their depreciation, that’s for sure.
![]() 03/08/2017 at 14:30 |
|
ah okay, thanks for the Porsche lesson!
![]() 03/08/2017 at 14:33 |
|
Same here, it may be a pipe-dream for me. But you never know! Otherwise I am totally content with cars in a lower price range, haha.